Digitisation of natural history collections: criteria for prioritisation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Digitisation of natural history collections : criteria for prioritisation. / Ahl, Louise Isager; Bellucci, Luca; Brewer, Philippa; Gagnier, Pierre-Yves; Hardy, Helen M.; Haston, Elspeth; Livermore, Laurence; De Smedt, Sofie; Enghoff, Henrik.

I: Research Ideas and Outcomes, Bind 9, e114548, 2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ahl, LI, Bellucci, L, Brewer, P, Gagnier, P-Y, Hardy, HM, Haston, E, Livermore, L, De Smedt, S & Enghoff, H 2023, 'Digitisation of natural history collections: criteria for prioritisation', Research Ideas and Outcomes, bind 9, e114548. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e114548

APA

Ahl, L. I., Bellucci, L., Brewer, P., Gagnier, P-Y., Hardy, H. M., Haston, E., Livermore, L., De Smedt, S., & Enghoff, H. (2023). Digitisation of natural history collections: criteria for prioritisation. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 9, [e114548]. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e114548

Vancouver

Ahl LI, Bellucci L, Brewer P, Gagnier P-Y, Hardy HM, Haston E o.a. Digitisation of natural history collections: criteria for prioritisation. Research Ideas and Outcomes. 2023;9. e114548. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.9.e114548

Author

Ahl, Louise Isager ; Bellucci, Luca ; Brewer, Philippa ; Gagnier, Pierre-Yves ; Hardy, Helen M. ; Haston, Elspeth ; Livermore, Laurence ; De Smedt, Sofie ; Enghoff, Henrik. / Digitisation of natural history collections : criteria for prioritisation. I: Research Ideas and Outcomes. 2023 ; Bind 9.

Bibtex

@article{ac2b210ec3ec4edba60a8c46ec091655,
title = "Digitisation of natural history collections: criteria for prioritisation",
abstract = "There are approximately 1.5 billion specimens kept in European Natural History Collections. The mission for the Distributed System of Scientific Collections (DiSSCo) is to unite all these specimens into a one-stop e-science infrastructure of digital specimens. This is a monumental digitisation task and criteria for how to prioritise this effort are, therefore, crucial for the success of the project. In this report, we have reviewed the literature and designed and conducted surveys of the digitisation plans and criteria used by DiSSCo Partners to understand the prioritisation criteria used in the digitisation of natural history collections. As an attempt to provide some guidance for the digitisation of specimens, we suggest that an organisation (e.g. DiSSCo or an individual institution) that is planning to digitise natural history collections considers four categories of prioritisation criteria: Relevance, Data quality, Cost and Feasibility.",
author = "Ahl, {Louise Isager} and Luca Bellucci and Philippa Brewer and Pierre-Yves Gagnier and Hardy, {Helen M.} and Elspeth Haston and Laurence Livermore and {De Smedt}, Sofie and Henrik Enghoff",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.3897/rio.9.e114548",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Research Ideas and Outcomes",
issn = "2367-7163",
publisher = "Pensoft Publishers",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digitisation of natural history collections

T2 - criteria for prioritisation

AU - Ahl, Louise Isager

AU - Bellucci, Luca

AU - Brewer, Philippa

AU - Gagnier, Pierre-Yves

AU - Hardy, Helen M.

AU - Haston, Elspeth

AU - Livermore, Laurence

AU - De Smedt, Sofie

AU - Enghoff, Henrik

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - There are approximately 1.5 billion specimens kept in European Natural History Collections. The mission for the Distributed System of Scientific Collections (DiSSCo) is to unite all these specimens into a one-stop e-science infrastructure of digital specimens. This is a monumental digitisation task and criteria for how to prioritise this effort are, therefore, crucial for the success of the project. In this report, we have reviewed the literature and designed and conducted surveys of the digitisation plans and criteria used by DiSSCo Partners to understand the prioritisation criteria used in the digitisation of natural history collections. As an attempt to provide some guidance for the digitisation of specimens, we suggest that an organisation (e.g. DiSSCo or an individual institution) that is planning to digitise natural history collections considers four categories of prioritisation criteria: Relevance, Data quality, Cost and Feasibility.

AB - There are approximately 1.5 billion specimens kept in European Natural History Collections. The mission for the Distributed System of Scientific Collections (DiSSCo) is to unite all these specimens into a one-stop e-science infrastructure of digital specimens. This is a monumental digitisation task and criteria for how to prioritise this effort are, therefore, crucial for the success of the project. In this report, we have reviewed the literature and designed and conducted surveys of the digitisation plans and criteria used by DiSSCo Partners to understand the prioritisation criteria used in the digitisation of natural history collections. As an attempt to provide some guidance for the digitisation of specimens, we suggest that an organisation (e.g. DiSSCo or an individual institution) that is planning to digitise natural history collections considers four categories of prioritisation criteria: Relevance, Data quality, Cost and Feasibility.

U2 - 10.3897/rio.9.e114548

DO - 10.3897/rio.9.e114548

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

JO - Research Ideas and Outcomes

JF - Research Ideas and Outcomes

SN - 2367-7163

M1 - e114548

ER -

ID: 382858764